|State||Defendant||Co-Defendants||Sex||Date||Election||D/R||Charged||Convicted||Type1||Type2||Type3||# Charges||# Fraudulent Votes / Election Margin||Description||Sentence||Source1||Source2||Source3||Source4||Source5||Follow Up|
|Kansas||Jerrald Alan Chesser||M||2010-11||Multiple Voting||1||Chesser was accused of voting in both Marshall County, Kansas, and Nebraska in November 2010 elections. Referred to county attorney; under investigation.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/403896-kansas-sos-4th-response-with-cases...|
|Connecticut||Michael Weinberg||M||Ineligible district voting||Michael Weinberg and wife Helene Barbara Weinberg lived in a home in Roxbury while simultaneously maintaining a home in New York City. A neighbor accused the couple of not living in Roxbury, and therefore illegally voting in the 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 elections. The neighbor also accused the couple of attempting to disenfranchise the votes of other Roxbury residents by sending out an email indicating that one could register and vote in Roxbury if they paid taxes there, and that they didn't necessarily have to live there. The State of Connecticut State Elections Enforcement Commission determined that the couple did qualify as residents of Roxbury, and didn't send out the email with the intent of disenfranchising anybody's vote, despite the incorrect legal advice. The matter was dismissed||Dismissed||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2009_122.pdf|
|Georgia||Timothy Godsey||M||2008-06||Vote Buying||Compensation offered to individuals to register and to vote. (State Elections Board Case #2007-00211080074, City of Chickamauga)||$2,000 fine, cease and desist order and a public reprimand||https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/369066/georgia-response-with-cases.pd...|
|Mississippi||Judy Lewis||F||2011-02||According to the Public Integrity Division Case View PI-11-00019, a complaint was filed against Judy Lewis on 2/11/11.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/370944-mississippi-2nd-cases.html|
|Pennsylvania||Robyn Pugh||F||2012-06||Registration Fraud||Former Middle Smithfield Township golf course director Robyn Pugh was accused of registering to vote in Middle Smithfield Township despite living in Smithfield Township. Charged with perjury, false swearing in official matters and unlawful voting.||http://www.poconorecord.com/article/20120612/NEWS/206120326|
|Washington||Aaron Warnock||M||1||Records received from Snohomish County Washington did not indicate the specific accusation. From a list of almost 200 voter fraud cases that occurred since June 2007, only one person was charged. According to the prosecutor's office, the remainder of the cases were not prosecuted and no records were kept on the type of specific charge for the unprosecuted cases.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/394076-washington-snohomish-county-respon...|
|Washington||Anthony Valenti||M||Registration Fraud||1||A charge of registration fraud against Anthony Valenti was found to have Insufficient evidence to pursue.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/368706-washington-clark-county-response-w...|
|Connecticut||Ann H. Coulter||F||2002 2004||Ineligible district voting||A complaint was made that Ann H. Coulter may have voted by absentee ballot two times, in a town where she was not a resident. Recommended that no further action be taken.||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2009_010.pdf|
|Washington||Robert Victor Holmgren||M||2004-11||2005-05||Absentee/Mail||Impersonation||1||Robert Victor Holmgren was charged with casting an absentee ballot in the name of his recently deceased spouse, Charlette Holmgren.||$250 fine (suspended)||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/395994-washington-king-county-cases.html|
|Connecticut||Shannon Nygard||2008-11||Registration Fraud||Ineligible district voting||1||A complaint was made that Richard Murray, Neill Bovaird, Kelly Way, Nancy Pilon, Janelle Rooks, M. Samantha Geiger, Amy Bovaird, Peter Nygard, Shannon Nygard and Angela Harwood were registered and in some cases voted in a place where they did not reside. An Election Commission investigation found that the defendants had registered in good faith with the belief that they did reside in the district in which they registered. The Commission found that had the Registrar's office been more thorough and done their due diligence, it would have found that the addresses provided were not within the required district and the voter registrations/voting would not have occurred.||Not charged||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2010_073.pdf|
How You Can Help
Join the movement and sign up for our Knowledge Network to get educated on the issues and opportunities to serve and connect with other citizen activists in your community.
Support True the Vote’s efforts to keep our elections free and fair.
Stay in touch
You can support True the Vote and get current information, insights and updates on various social media platforms.