|State||Defendant||Co-Defendants||Sex||Date||Election||D/R||Charged||Convicted||Type1||Type2||Type3||# Charges||# Fraudulent Votes / Election Margin||Description||Sentence||Source1||Source2||Source3||Source4||Source5||Follow Up|
|Connecticut||Rosemary Blade||F||Absentee Ballot Fraud||Blade, who worked as a checker at her polling place on Election Day, was accused of voting an absentee ballot when she could have voted in person.||$100 fine, ordered to comply with the law in the future and lost eligibility for certain election jobs|
|Connecticut||Leslie Wertam||Absentee Ballot Fraud||A complaint was made that Leslie Wertam violated laws for the distribution of absentee ballots. No further action taken on complaint.|
|Texas||Jose Tellez||M||A grand jury dropped the charges against Jose Tellez.||Dismissed|
|Connecticut||Angelina Paul||F||Absentee/Mail||Illegal Assistance||Paul, who worked at the polls as a registrar and for a campaign, was accused of violating laws for assisting people with and handling absentee ballots. She also was accused of voting an absentee ballot when she was not qualified to.||Civil penalty of $2,000. Ordered to comply with the law in the future. Lost eligibility to work certain jobs as an election official and handle absentee ballots.|
|Connecticut||Angel Resto||M||Absentee Ballot Fraud||Resto, a city employee, was accused of voting an absentee ballot when he could have voted in person.||Ordered to comply with the law in the future|
|Connecticut||Thomas R. Paterno, Sr.||M||Absentee Ballot Fraud||Paterno, a city employee, was accused of voting an absentee ballot when he could have voted in person.||$200 fine and ordered to comply with the law in the future|
|Connecticut||Hector Robles Campaign||D||Registration Fraud||A married couple alleged that they were registered as Democrats against their wishes. The State of Connecticut Elections Enforcement Commission investigated the Hector Robles Campaign, which registered the voters. The case was dismissed because of insufficient of evidence, but is "subject to the Commission's right to reopen" if "new evidence is discovered."||Dismissed, but case could be reopened if new evidence wsa discovered.|
|Connecticut||Laurence P. Czajkowski (candidate for city council)||M||Registration Fraud||Ineligible district voting||3||Czajkowski, a candidate for city council, was accused of signing a voter registration application using an address where he did not reside and voting three times using that address.||$1,500 fine and ordered to comply with the law in the future|
|Texas||Pauline Cusack (election official)||F||There were reportedly voting irregularities in a Gillsepie County election that Pauline Cusack oversaw. Case declined for prosecution. Letter sent to Secretary of State.|
|Connecticut||Joan A. Forte||F||D||Absentee/mail||Illegal Assistance||Prior to a Democratic Town Committee primary, Forte filled in the upper portion of the Form ED-3, "Application for Absentee Ballot," for individuals who reside in public housing in New Haven, Connecticut. Under General Statutes, Forte was required to sign these applications but failed to do so. Forte entered a consent agreement, saying that she would pay a civil penalty of $500 and in the future comply with the requirements.||Civil penalty of $500 and in the future comply with the requirements.|
How You Can Help
Join the movement and sign up for our Knowledge Network to get educated on the issues and opportunities to serve and connect with other citizen activists in your community.
Support True the Vote’s efforts to keep our elections free and fair.
Stay in touch
You can support True the Vote and get current information, insights and updates on various social media platforms.