|State||Defendant||Co-Defendants||Sex||Date||Election||D/R||Charged||Convicted||Type1||Type2||Type3||# Charges||# Fraudulent Votes / Election Margin||Description||Sentence||Source1||Source2||Source3||Source4||Source5||Follow Up|
|Connecticut||Maura McLoughlin||F||Ineligible district voting||The New Hartford Registrar of Voters brought a complaint against Maura McLoughlin questioning her residency based on the facts that two individuals living at the claimed residence stated McLoughlin did not reside there and her driver's license had a different address than the one claimed. The Connecticut Elections Enforcement Commission investigation concluded that McLoughlin was a qualified voter and the matter was dismissed.||Dismissed||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2009_031.pdf|
|New Hampshire||Taylor Lanier Peters||M||2008-11||General||Registration Fraud||Ineligible district voting||The New Hampshire Attorney General's Office investigated Taylor Lanier Peters because he reportedly registered and voted for the first time on Election Day without photo identification, and the United States Post Office returned a verification letter sent to his address as undeliverable. His identity was later verified, according to a New Hampshire Attorney General's Office investigation. Peters was not charged.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/403928-new-hampshire-voting-fraud-report-...|
|Kentucky||Lawrence County - Name Unknown||2010||Registration Fraud||An unnamed individual was charged with wrongful registration. Indicted by grand jury.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/399240-kentucky-statewide-cases.html|
|Kentucky||Jeffrey Newport||Martha Hughes Tony Gumm William Proffitt Corey Page Michael Page||M||2006-11||General||Vote buying||Jeffrey Newport pleaded* guilty to conspiring to buy votes in the 2006 Monroe County general election, along with Martha Hughes, Tony Gumm, William Proffitt, Corey Page, and Michael Page. From October to November 7, 2006, the group conspired to pay voters to cast walk-in absentee ballots.||*Plea deal: 2 years probation, 2 months home incarceration, $500 fine||http://www.wbko.com/home/headlines/4_Monroe_Countians_Sentenced_in_Vote-Buying_S...||https://www.fbi.gov/louisville/press-releases/2011/final-defendant-pleads-guilty...|
|Connecticut||CT ACORN||2008||Registration Fraud||Two Republican registrars of voters brought complaints to the State Elections Enforcement Commission that hundreds of registration applications ACORN submitted to them were "problem cards." The Commission investigated ACORN's actions near the registrars' cities, Bridgeport and Stamford. An investigation found there was not enough evidence to "determine that CT ACORN had an institutional or systemic role in designing and implementing a scheme or strategy to fraudulently register or enroll electors" in the two cities. The Commission took no further action.||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/fd_2008_131%20&135.pdf|
|Georgia||Stephen Bell||M||Petition Fraud||Stephen Bell was accused of not signing as affidavit of petition circulator in the presence of a notary. Notaries did not notarize in the presence of affiants.||https://web.archive.org/web/20161216002204/http://www.documentcloud.org/document...|
|Georgia||Roberta Abdul-Salam (state representative)||F||Runoff||OTHER||Roberta Abdul-Salam, state representative-elect, campaigned inside a polling place for the August 2005 runoff election. Witnesses reported that Abdul-Salaam told voters she was a poll watcher, but Abdul-Salaam denied this.||Cease and desist order||https://web.archive.org/web/20161216002204/http://www.documentcloud.org/document...|
|Georgia ADDED SOURCE||Jeremy Scheinbart||M||Petition Fraud||Jeremy Scheinbart was accused of not signing as affidavit of petition circulator in presence of notary; Notaries did not notarize in presence of affiants. Case closed.||https://web.archive.org/web/20161226021856/http://www.documentcloud.org/document...|
|Texas||Sylvia Longoria||F||Sylvia Longoria was mailed a letter. No new violations were reported. Statue of limitations expired.|
|Connecticut||Stenley Cohen||M||Ineligible district voting||Stanley and Barbara Cohen were accused of voting using the address of a place they did not reside. The Connecticut Elections Enforcement Commission investigation concluded that the matter should be dismissed.||Dismissed||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/2008_047.pdf|
How You Can Help
Join the movement and sign up for our Knowledge Network to get educated on the issues and opportunities to serve and connect with other citizen activists in your community.
Support True the Vote’s efforts to keep our elections free and fair.
Stay in touch
You can support True the Vote and get current information, insights and updates on various social media platforms.