|State||Defendant||Co-Defendants||Sex||Date||Election||D/R||Charged||Convicted||Type1||Type2||Type3||# Charges||# Fraudulent Votes / Election Margin||Description||Sentence||Source1||Source2||Source3||Source4||Source5||Follow Up|
|Kansas||Sherman County - Name Unknown||2010||Multiple Voting||1||A person was accused of voting in both Kansas and Colorado. Evidence collected.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/366880-kansas-2nd-response-part-1.html|
|Texas||Andrea Campos Bierstedt||F||2008||Primary||Absentee/Mail||Illegal assistance||2||2||Andrea Campos Bierstedt was charged with two counts of absentee ballot fraud for illegal possession of a ballot and unlawful assistance (TEC 64.036 and 86.006) in the 2008 primary election. bierstedt entered pre-trial diversion.||Pre-Trial Intervention: 6 months, $3500 donation to county||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/404105-texas-ag-response.html||Duval/Live Oak: 20082, 20083|
|Connecticut||Helene Barbara Weinberg||F||Ineligible district voting||Michael Weinberg and wife Helene Barbara Weinberg lived in a home in Roxbury while simultaneously maintaining a home in New York City. A neighbor accused the couple of not living in Roxbury, and therefore illegally voting in the 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 elections. The neighbor also accused the couple of attempting to disenfranchise the votes of other Roxbury residents by sending out an email indicating that one could register and vote in Roxbury if they paid taxes there, and that they didn't necessarily have to live there. The State of Connecticut State Elections Enforcement Commission determined that the couple did qualify as residents of Roxbury, and didn't send out the email with the intent of disenfranchising anybody's vote, despite the incorrect legal advice. The matter was dismissed||Dismissed||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2009_122.pdf|
|Pennsylvania||Jemar Barksdale||M||Registration Fraud||Jemar Barksdale was charged with changing 18 voter registration applications while he worked for ACORN.|
|Washington||Bettina Siharath||1||Records received from Snohomish County Washington did not indicate the specific accusation. From a list of almost 200 voter fraud cases that occurred since June 2007, only one person was charged. According to the prosecutor's office, the remainder of the cases were not prosecuted and no records were kept on the type of specific charge for the unprosecuted cases.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/394076-washington-snohomish-county-respon...|
|Washington||Michael Severson||M||Registration Fraud||1||A charge of registration fraud againstMichael Severson was found to have Insufficient evidence to pursue.||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/368706-washington-clark-county-response-w...|
|Kansas||Sedgwick County - Names Unknown||2006||Intimidation||A candidate for legislature accused poll agents for a political party of asking voters their names and telling them how to vote. Voters reportedly said they felt intimidated. (multiple cases)||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/366880-kansas-2nd-response-part-1.html|
|Wisconsin||Maria Miles (ACORN employee)||Kevin Clancy||F||2008||General||Registration fraud||1||0||Maria Miles of Milwaukee pleaded* guilty to one count of Falsely Procuring Voter Registration as Party to a Crime (Felony Class I) while working for ACORN during the 2008 presidential election. Clancy was accused of submitting multiple voter registration applications for the same individuals, and also was part of a scheme in which he and other Special Registration Deputies registered each other to vote multiple times in order to meet voter registration quotas imposed by ACORN. Co-defendant and fellow ACORN employee Kevin Clancy also pleaded guilty to the same charge.||http://www.maciverinstitute.com/2010/10/acorn-worker-pleads-guilty-to-vote-fraud...|
|Colorado||Winston Keyes||M||Multiple voting||2||1||Winston Keyes pleaded* guilty to voting twice. A second charge of forgery of a government-issued document was dropped.||*Plea deal: 12 months probation, $159 fine, court costs||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/370952-colorado-cases.html|
|Connecticut||Joseph Guzek||M||Absentee/Mail||Guzek, a city employee, voted an absentee ballot when he could have voted in person.||$200 fine and odered to comply with the law in the future|
How You Can Help
Join the movement and sign up for our Knowledge Network to get educated on the issues and opportunities to serve and connect with other citizen activists in your community.
Support True the Vote’s efforts to keep our elections free and fair.
Stay in touch
You can support True the Vote and get current information, insights and updates on various social media platforms.