|State||Defendant||Co-Defendants||Sex||Date||Election||D/R||Charged||Convicted||Type1||Type2||Type3||# Charges||# Fraudulent Votes / Election Margin||Description||Sentence||Source1||Source2||Source3||Source4||Source5||Follow Up|
|Connecticut||Janelle Rooks||F||Registration Fraud||A complaint was made that Richard Murray, Neill Bovaird, Kelly Way, Nancy Pilon, Janelle Rooks, M. Samantha Geiger, Amy Bovaird, Peter Nygard, Shannon Nygard and Angela Harwood were registered and in some cases voted in a place where they did not reside. An Election Commission investigation found that the defendants had registered in good faith with the belief that they did reside in the district in which they registered. The Commission found that had the Registrar's office been more thorough and done their due diligence, it would have found that the addresses provided were not within the required district and the voter registrations/voting would not have occurred.||Not charged||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2010_073.pdf|
|Connecticut||Amy Bovaird||F||Registration Fraud||A complaint was made that Richard Murray, Neill Bovaird, Kelly Way, Nancy Pilon, Janelle Rooks, M. Samantha Geiger, Amy Bovaird, Peter Nygard, Shannon Nygard and Angela Harwood were registered and in some cases voted in a place where they did not reside. An Election Commission investigation found that the defendants had registered in good faith with the belief that they did reside in the district in which they registered. The Commission found that had the Registrar's office been more thorough and done their diligence, it would have found that the addresses provided were not within the required district and the voter registrations/voting would not have occurred.||Not charged||http://seec.ct.gov/e2casebase/data/fd/FD_2010_073.pdf|
|Connecticut||Stephen M. Lanno||M||2004-11||Presidential||Multiple Voting||A complaint was made that Stephen M. Lanno may have voted in more than one town during the 2004 presidential election. An investigation found he did not.||Dismissed|
|Connecticut||Gary Williams||M||Absentee Ballot Fraud||A complaint was raised that Gary Williams was involved in voting and absentee ballot irregularities that may have occurred in connection with a ward co-chair primary. No further action taken on complaint.|
|Connecticut||Karen Salisbury||F||Impersonation||Registration Fraud||A complaint was raised that Karen Salisbury might have fraudulently used her dead husband's name to register to vote. No further action taken on complaint.|
|Connecticut||Millie Herrera||F||Absentee Ballot Fraud||A complaint was raised that Millie Herrera violated absentee ballot laws. Complaint was dismissed.||Dismissed|
|Texas||Jose Tellez||M||A grand jury dropped the charges against Jose Tellez.||Dismissed|
|Ohio||Claudel Gilbert||M||2007-05||Multiple Voting||4||1||A Haitian immigrant naturalized in 2004, Claudel Gilbert was accused of registering at a new address while still registered at his old address. He pleaded guilty to voting twice and to voting in a precinct where he did not live. Charged with 2 counts false registration, 2 counts illegal voting. Pleaded guilty to 2 counts false registration. Other counts dropped.||$500 fine and 1 year probation||http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/396370-ohio-franklin-county-claudel-gilbe...|
|Missouri||Election contest: Bruce Franks v. Penny Hubbard||2016-08||Democratic primary||D||2016-08||Election contest||Absentee/Mail||Ballot tampering||230||A judge ordered a new election in the August 2016 Democratic primary for Missouri state House District 78, saying that “the court is firmly convinced” that absentee ballot irregularities “affected the outcome of the election.” Challenger Bruce Franks contested the results after losing to incumbent Penny Hubbard by just 90 votes. Franks alleged that as many as 230 absentee ballots were obtained illegally, were tampered with, or both.||New election ordered - outcome changed/Franks won||http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/st-louis-election-board-ask...||http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/p-d-investigation-reveals-mu...||http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/absentee-voting-under-way-i...|
|Texas||Election Contest: Gilberto Perez v. Oziel Treviño||2016-06||Hidalgo municipal runoff||Election contest||Absentee/Mail||Illegal assistance||6||A judge ordered a new election to be held for Hidalgo City Council Place 5 after candidate Gilberto Perez successfully contested the results, proving that campaign workers aligned with his opponent, incumbent councilman Oziel Treviño, gave voters illegal assistance with mail-in ballots in the June 2016 runoff election and that non-residents and ineligible people cast ballots in the Place 5 race. Perez lost the seat to Trevino by just six votes in the runoff election. Most witnesses testified that they received voting assistance when they did not actually require assistance and that campaign workers insisted they vote for the slate sponsored by city councilman Rudy Franz. One person testified they were paid by a campaign worker to register others at her home who did not live in the city of Hidalgo.||New election ordered||http://valleycentral.com/news/local/judge-orders-new-election-to-be-held-in-hida...|
How You Can Help
Join the movement and sign up for our Knowledge Network to get educated on the issues and opportunities to serve and connect with other citizen activists in your community.
Support True the Vote’s efforts to keep our elections free and fair.
Stay in touch
You can support True the Vote and get current information, insights and updates on various social media platforms.